Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: snapshot/switch version number

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Ludek Finstrle" <luf(at)pzkagis(dot)cz>
Cc: <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: snapshot/switch version number
Date: 2006-04-21 14:17:27
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4011C9E91@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ludek Finstrle [mailto:luf(at)pzkagis(dot)cz] 
> Sent: 21 April 2006 15:15
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] snapshot/switch version number
> 
> > > I vote for renumbering experimental branch to stable one (to
> > > 08.01.1001 or maybe 08.01.1000). 08.01.0XXX has no additional 
> > > support (my opinion is it's waste of time).
> > 
> > It's already at 08.02.0001 (see
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-odbc/2006-04/msg00028.php)
> 
> Does we plan to release 08.02.0100 in quite short time (eg. 
> in few weeks)?
> I think it is confusing for users that we recommend enhanced 
> experimental branch due to better stability, more features etc.

I don't see why not. We don't have to wait for PostgreSQL to catch up
after all. There is another fix that Hiroshi's working on but once
that's done if there's nothing else...

Regards, Dave.

pgsql-odbc by date

Next:From: Geoffrey ClementsDate: 2006-04-21 21:28:55
Subject: Problem inserting with remote views in vfp
Previous:From: Ludek FinstrleDate: 2006-04-21 14:15:00
Subject: Re: snapshot/switch version number

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group