From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Ludek Finstrle" <luf(at)pzkagis(dot)cz> |
Cc: | <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <anoopk(at)pervasive-postgres(dot)com>, "Hiroshi Inoue" <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Hiroshi Saito" <saito(at)skcapi(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Subject: | Re: Future versions of psqlODBC |
Date: | 2006-03-22 12:22:05 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4011C96DA@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Ludek Finstrle
> Sent: 22 March 2006 11:58
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org; Ludek Finstrle;
> anoopk(at)pervasive-postgres(dot)com; Hiroshi Inoue; Hiroshi Saito
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] Future versions of psqlODBC
>
> > I therefore propose the following:
> >
> > 1) The current CVS code is branched into a
> REL-08_01_PATCHES branch to
> > be used for bug fixes.
>
> Sure.
>
> > 2) The REL-07_03_ENHANCED branch is merged into CVS tip, whilst
> > maintaing the current installer and documentation etc.
>
> Sure.
>
> > 3) The driver is rebranded to
> > PostgreSQL+/psqlodbcplus.so/psqlodbcplus.lib to
> differentiate it from
> > all previous versions.
>
> I disagree. If I remember it right there was psqlodbcplus already.
> Why confuse users more? Why we need the differentiation? The driver
> is based on 7.3 version ...
Well, either way it will be different from 08.01 because there is only
one driver in the 7.3E branch, so there is no ANSI/Unicode distinction.
As for the name, yes, there was a psqlodbcplus, but I thought they never
actually released anything. On double checking that's not the case so
that isn't such a good name as you say.
We could just return to plain old psqlodbc/PostgreSQL ?
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bart Samwel | 2006-03-22 12:38:41 | Re: Future development |
Previous Message | Bart Samwel | 2006-03-22 12:20:38 | Re: Most recent driver aborts transaction after one error |