From: | Horák Daniel <horak(at)sit(dot)plzen-city(dot)cz> |
---|---|
To: | "'Thomas Lockhart'" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: Call for porting reports |
Date: | 2000-04-03 11:51:08 |
Message-ID: | E33858CBACEDD3118C6700A024B3BF909955FB@exchange.mmp.plzen-city.cz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > > WIN9x (Magnus Hagander, v6.4, client side only. Still good?)
> > That should probably read Win32 - it's WinNT/2000 too. And
> WinNT client
> > libraries compiled using Cygwin will not work on "native NT".
> > I've compiled and tested 7.0beta3, looks good (client side only).
> >
> > > WINNT (Daniel Horak already reported for v7.0. Thanks!)
> > That shuold probably be called WinNT/Cygwin or something,
It is possible to call it WinNT/Cygwin because there can be a port using
UWIN or even a "native" port.
> since it's not
> > really Win32/NT.
> > Oh, and has it been tested on Windows 2000? If not, I can
> probably throw
> > together a test sometime this week.
>
> Thanks for the info. I'll update the entries. I can't remember if
> Daniel was testing on W2K or on something else. Daniel?
I have not tested pgsql on W2K, but I am testing Win95 and it looks
promissing - it is possible to run initdb, start postmaster and only a newly
created backend dies (with segfault) after it receives a connection from a
client. And such an error could be solved (I hope ;-). It has no problems
with the IPC stuff.
Dan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-04-03 12:48:00 | Re: AW: src/test/locale/de_DE.ISO-8859-1 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-04-03 05:32:20 | Re: 7.0 release notes should call out incompatible changes more clearly |