Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: serious trouble with bool and Access

From: "Henshall, Stuart - WCP" <SHenshall(at)westcountrypublications(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "'Markus Wagner'" <wagner(at)imsd(dot)uni-mainz(dot)de>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: serious trouble with bool and Access
Date: 2002-02-19 14:13:28
Message-ID: E2870D8CE1CCD311BAF50008C71EDE8E01F747ED@MAIL_EXCHANGE (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
Hi,
	Bools are 16 bit integers in MS Access. To get around this
problem I just defined int2 in the fields where I wanted bools and 
this seems to be working fine. I always check field<>false as, in MS 
Access, false=0 and true=-1, but of course int2s can have other 
values. To help MS Access with its versioning try turning row 
versioning on.
Hope this helps,
- Stuart

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Markus Wagner [mailto:wagner(at)imsd(dot)uni-mainz(dot)de]
> Sent: 15 February 2002 07:36
> To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: serious trouble with bool and Access
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> we're in serious trouble with an application using BOOLs. We 
> have boolean 
> attributes in a pg table, being represented as checkboxes in 
> Access. Changing 
> these controls results in an error message "another user has 
> changed the 
> data", or something like that.
> 
> We tried nearly everything. The mailing list archives gave 
> hints to the pg 
> ODBC driver, the "bools as char" flag and so on. We tried 
> with and without 
> this flag. Then, without it, the problem seemed to be solved. 
> But we found 
> that now the data must have been changed several times in 
> different records, 
> before the problem reappears.
> 
> Our current settings are "bools as char" off, "text as 
> longvarchar" off. The 
> bools are normal BOOL attributes of size 1, as reported by 
> pgaccess. We also 
> tried to change the table properties for the fields in 
> Access, "display as 
> checkbox" and so on. We drag the fields from the field list 
> into the form. 
> But also changing the ODBC-connected tables directly results 
> in the same 
> error.
> 
> Isn't there a unique solution to that? Why are bools that critical?
> 
> Thank you very much,
> 
> Markus
> 

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-02-19 15:01:57
Subject: Re: odbc on unix
Previous:From: Michael MeskesDate: 2002-02-19 12:22:42
Subject: Re: odbc on unix

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group