Re: Porting to Native WindowsNT/2000

From: "Henshall, Stuart - WCP" <SHenshall(at)westcountrypublications(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "'Ian Lance Taylor'" <ian(at)airs(dot)com>, Dwayne Miller <dmiller(at)espgroup(dot)net>
Cc: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Porting to Native WindowsNT/2000
Date: 2001-09-03 09:03:55
Message-ID: E2870D8CE1CCD311BAF50008C71EDE8E01F74692@MAIL_EXCHANGE
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> "Dwayne Miller" <dmiller(at)espgroup(dot)net> writes:
>
> > Well, for one.... I have no idea what cygwin is, or what it does to
> > your system, or what security vulnerabilities it might add to your
> > system. It comes with alot of stuff that I may or may not need, but
> > what components I need to run Postgres is not clear.
>
> Cygwin is a Unix environment for Windows. For information, see
> http://cygwin.com/
>
> Cygwin comes with a lot of stuff which you don't need to run Postgres.
> Simply having that stuff on your computer will not introduce any
> security vulnerabilities if you don't run the programs. Cygwin is
> simply a DLL and a bunch of Unix programs. It has no server
> component.
>
> In order to build Postgres, you will need the compiler and associated
> tools. In order to run all the Postgres commands, you will need the
> shell and several of the tools.
>
> In fact, I believe that a cygwin distribution actually comes with
> Postgres prebuilt and ready to run.
>
> (To be honest, the idea of worrying about security vulnerabilities on
> Windows seems odd to me. If you are honestly worried about security
> on your database server, the first step is to stop running Windows.)
>
> > Two.... could Postgres be made more efficient on Windows if it ran
> > without cygwin?
>
> Yes. Cygwin adds measurable overhead to all I/O operations, and
> obviously a database does a lot of I/O. Postgres employs operations
> which are fast on Unix but are very slow on cygwin, such as fork.
>
> As mlw said, porting Postgres to run natively on Windows would be a
> significant effort. The forking mechanism it uses currently would
> have to be completely rearchitected. The buffer, file manager, and
> networking code would have to be rewritten. Off the top of my head,
> for a top programmer who is an expert in Unix, Windows, and Postgres,
> it might take a year. There would also be a heavy ongoing maintenance
> cost to keep up with new Postgres releases.
>
> > Three.... can you start cygwin programs on startup of the system?
>
> Sure. cygwin programs are just Windows programs which use a
> particular DLL.
>
> Ian
>
Cygrunsrv allows postgresql to be run as a service. There's a slight hiccup
on shutdown meaning that the postmaster.pid file gets left. This is due to
sighup being sent by windows shutdown. I think current cygwin snapshots
might cure this, otherwise there is a patch some where that causes SIGHUP to
be ignored. I *think* the pre-built binary already has this patch applied.

- Stuart

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message gabriel 2001-09-03 13:08:40 INDEX BUG???
Previous Message Vladimir V. Zolotych 2001-09-03 08:30:32 Conditional operators ALL, ANY in WHERE clause