From: | János <janos(dot)lobb(at)yale(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Havasvölgyi Ottó <h(dot)otto(at)freemail(dot)hu> |
Cc: | <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: need suggestion for server sizing |
Date: | 2005-06-13 13:25:30 |
Message-ID: | E1EE5F72-545F-441C-BBEA-0C52B2BD4ECB@yale.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice pgsql-performance |
Any XServe from Apple will do it.
János
On Jun 10, 2005, at 5:12 PM, Havasvölgyi Ottó wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I need your help to determine the configuration of a server
> machine, and the
> PG DBMS.
> There will be not more than 25 concurrent users. They will use a
> business
> software that accesses tha database. The database will be not that
> large, it
> seems that none of the tables's recordcount will exceed 1-2
> million, but
> there will be a lot of small (<5000 record) tables. The numbert of
> tables
> will be about 300. What server would you install to such a site to
> make the
> database respond quickly in any case?
> I would like to leave fsync on.
> Perhaps you need some additional information. In this case just
> indicate it.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Otto
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that
> your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
------------------------------------------
"There was a mighty king in the land of the Huns whose goodness and
wisdom had no equal."
Nibelungen-Lied
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-06-13 14:10:00 | Re: Problems with trigger and function. |
Previous Message | Ville Leinonen | 2005-06-13 11:15:17 | Problems with trigger and function. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2005-06-13 13:28:52 | Re: Index ot being used |
Previous Message | Alex Stapleton | 2005-06-13 13:08:08 | Re: PostgreSQL using the wrong Index |