Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Sanity Check?

From: "Larry Rosenman" <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: "'pgsql-hackers list'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Sanity Check?
Date: 2005-07-27 22:38:46
Message-ID: E1DxuYx-0002Ml-Af@lerami.lerctr.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
SCO is seeing the following failure without -O, but no failure with -O:

The sanity_check diffs show:
*** ./expected/sanity_check.out Wed Jul 27 17:58:12 2005
--- ./results/sanity_check.out  Wed Jul 27 18:09:41 2005
***************
*** 17,22 ****
--- 17,24 ----
   circle_tbl          | t
   fast_emp4000        | t
   func_index_heap     | t
+  gcircle_tbl         | t
+  gpolygon_tbl        | t
   hash_f8_heap        | t
   hash_i4_heap        | t
   hash_name_heap      | t
***************
*** 67,73 ****
   shighway            | t
   tenk1               | t
   tenk2               | t
! (57 rows)

  --
  -- another sanity check: every system catalog that has OIDs should have
--- 69,75 ----
   shighway            | t
   tenk1               | t
   tenk2               | t
! (59 rows)

  --
  -- another sanity check: every system catalog that has OIDs should have


Any ideas?  I'm **NOT** seeing this on my box, but.

LER


-- 
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812                 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 3535 Gaspar Drive, Dallas, TX 75220-3611 US


Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2005-07-27 22:40:14
Subject: Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
Previous:From: Michael FuhrDate: 2005-07-27 22:35:02
Subject: Re: RESULT_OID Bug

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group