| From: | Richard Welty <rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] interesting PHP/MySQL thread |
| Date: | 2003-06-23 04:04:08 |
| Message-ID: | E19UIYq-0004dX-8l@skipper.averillpark.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-docs pgsql-general |
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003 23:57:10 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I'd be happy if PHP would adopt a database-neutral stance, ie, nothing
> in particular bundled into their core distribution. That might not be
> compatible with their project goals though. Anyone have a feeling about
> how important it is to them to have bundled DB support?
i'm not really a member of the "php community", but i have used it quite a
lot, and the database features are a key component, they're a big part of
why you use php. i'd think that having some db support bundled in their
core is very important to them.
richard
--
Richard Welty rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net
Averill Park Networking 518-573-7592
Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sean Chittenden | 2003-06-23 04:22:59 | Re: [GENERAL] interesting PHP/MySQL thread |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-23 03:57:10 | Re: [GENERAL] interesting PHP/MySQL thread |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sean Chittenden | 2003-06-23 04:22:59 | Re: [GENERAL] interesting PHP/MySQL thread |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-23 03:57:10 | Re: [GENERAL] interesting PHP/MySQL thread |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sean Chittenden | 2003-06-23 04:22:59 | Re: [GENERAL] interesting PHP/MySQL thread |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-06-23 04:00:25 | Re: [HACKERS] large objects |