Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: TODO items for window functions

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TODO items for window functions
Date: 2009-01-01 11:45:25
Message-ID: E1654F91-CC01-4F71-82FA-1584876D8096@hi-media.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi,

Happy new year!

Le 31 déc. 08 à 17:04, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> a écrit :
> However, it seems kind of inconsistent to do this for window functions
> unless we also make \df start putting parens around the argument lists
> for regular functions.  Comments?

A way to distinguish between window functions "seeing" frames vs.  
partitions, if possible, would sound quite useful after a docs reading  
session.
AKA OVER(... order by ...) effect in some other thread.

-- 
dim

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2009-01-01 13:42:42
Subject: Re: TODO items for window functions
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2009-01-01 10:00:41
Subject: Re: lazy_truncate_heap()

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group