Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?

From: "Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
To: "Seneca Cunningham" <scunning(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>,<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: <pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org>,<pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Date: 2005-11-22 09:07:15
Message-ID: E1539E0ED7043848906A8FF995BDA5799A5651@m0143.s-mxs.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patchespgsql-ports
> With AIX 5, the easiest way to get a shared object is to pass
"-bexpall"
> to the linker. This results in all symbols being exported.

Yes, that is another reason not to use this broken switch.
And last time I checked (AIX 4.3.3), -bexpall did not export all needed
symbols
(e.g. globals) from the backend eighter. And the counterpart -bimpall
did also not work.
Dynamic loading did not work without the .imp and .exp files :-(

Andreas

PS: I'd prefer if readline was only linked where it is needed, namely in
psql.

Responses

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2005-11-22 09:57:47
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-11-22 01:09:16
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2005-11-22 09:21:26
Subject: Re: Practical error logging for very large COPY
Previous:From: Dennis BjorklundDate: 2005-11-22 08:39:49
Subject: Re: Web page down (ad server)

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2005-11-22 09:57:47
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2005-11-22 01:51:21
Subject: Re: In pg_dump "no owner" mode don't dump owner names in

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group