| From: | "Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Alon Goldshuv" <agoldshuv(at)greenplum(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: NOLOGGING option, or ? |
| Date: | 2005-06-02 10:09:26 |
| Message-ID: | E1539E0ED7043848906A8FF995BDA5790C518C@m0143.s-mxs.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Escape processing would proceed as before, but the semantics would change to
> allow the use of different characters as the escape character, in addition
> to the special characters for delimiter and newline.
If you mean syntax to specify escape and delimiter (and newline ?),
that is a great addition, that imho all would like.
> Also, escape
> processing would be "false" as the default, so that the only special
> characters by default would be the newline and delimiter characters.
I don't see how that would be any advantage ? What is so wrong about having syntax to
choose no escape processing, like "escape ''" ?
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2005-06-02 13:22:24 | Re: Google's Summer of Code ... |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2005-06-02 08:09:22 | Re: lastval() |