Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: HOT - preliminary results

From: "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
To: "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: HOT - preliminary results
Date: 2007-03-01 15:43:01
Message-ID: E1539E0ED7043848906A8FF995BDA57901CB0032@m0143.s-mxs.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > accounts       157895  (initial size)       49284 (increase)
> > accounts_pkey  19709   (initial size)       19705 (increase)
> >
> >
> Just to clarify, the relation size and increase is in number 
> of blocks.

The numbers are quite impressive :-) Have you removed the selects on
accounts too ?
Seems that should also show improvements.

Do you prune chains during update also ? This seems important for a
scenario where only few selects but many updates happen.

Andreas


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2007-03-01 15:45:00
Subject: Re: Dead Space Map version 2
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-03-01 15:31:38
Subject: Re: CLUSTER, using SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE lock?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group