| From: | David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Steve Simms <steve(at)deefs(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Web Development Mailing List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Bricolage: Impressive |
| Date: | 2004-01-19 18:25:26 |
| Message-ID: | DA7A5E11-4AAC-11D8-8158-000A95972D84@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Jan 18, 2004, at 10:51 AM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> David, could you comment to Robert's questions below?
>
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2004, Robert Treat wrote:
>
>> stumbling block for techdocs. One thing that we do need is the
>> ablility
>> for users comments on articles, is there any provision for that?
>> Another thing that could come up would be user articles submitted in
>> pdf
>> form (I just added one yesterday), is there a provision for that?
No. Bricolage is entirely a back=end application. For users to comment
on articles, you'd have to do one of two things: Either implement
something for it on the front-end server (I'm sure there are plenty of
simple OSS solutions for this), or create some sort of gateway script
that takes a submitted comment and submits it to the Bricolage SOAP
server to be added to a document, and then triggering the republish of
that document.
For performance reasons, I recommend the former.
HTH,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2004-01-19 18:38:41 | Re: New PostgreSQL search resource |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-01-19 18:21:58 | Re: New PostgreSQL search resource |