Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bad Data back Door

From: "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
To: "Tom Lane *EXTERN*" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,"David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
Cc: "Pg Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bad Data back Door
Date: 2012-10-09 12:48:09
Message-ID: D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C20886AB63@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> Now, having said that, I think it has to be the reponsibility of
the FDW
>>>> to apply any required check ... which makes this a bug report
against
>>>> oracle_fdw, not the core system.

> As the author I agree that this is a bug in oracle_fdw.

Ok, fixed.
David, could you try the latest version from CVS to see
if it works for you?

Yours,
Laurenz Albe


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Amit KapilaDate: 2012-10-09 13:04:31
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] BUG #7534: walreceiver takes long time to detect n/w breakdown
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-10-09 12:35:03
Subject: Re: Placement of permissions checks for large object operations

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group