Greg Smith wrote:
> A web site doc comment from user skong today points out a small issue
> around the sample INSTR function given in plpgsql-porting.html that I
> can't confirm (none of those dirty Oracle instances here today), but
> sounds legit.
> A look at Oracle's documentation on the INSTR function at
> says that the 3rd input, position to start searching, cannot be zero.
> skong says that Oracle will just return a 0 if you give it that
> The INSTR implementation in the docs will instead search backwards
> the end of the string if you tell it to start at 0, same as if you
> it a negative input. I think it's therefore possible to get the
> version to return a value in cases Oracle would instead return 0.
> like a straightforward thing to confirm and change the sample to do
> differently; just have to add an explicit test for a 0 value of
I can confirm that Oracle returns 0 if the third argument to
INSTR is 0.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-07-03 12:45:40|
|Subject: Re: huge tlb support|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-07-03 12:30:35|
|Subject: Re: xlog filename formatting functions in recovery|