Tom Lane wrote:
>> What if you remove the exact cost comparison, but leave the part
>> old dominates new based on rows?
> Um, that is what the proposed patch does.
I was referring to the first two lines that the patch removes.
I guess I don't understand why they should go.
Anyway, I fail to see how this patch could introduce new
instabilities, so it seems safe for me.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Stephen Frost||Date: 2012-04-20 15:30:07|
|Subject: Re: Plan stability versus near-exact ties in cost estimates|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2012-04-20 15:20:25|
|Subject: Re: New sync commit mode remote_write|