Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> My attempt at a syntax that could also cover Peter's wish for multiple
>> checker functions:
>>
>> CHECK FUNCTION { func(args) | ALL [IN SCHEMA schema] [FOR ROLE user] }
>>  [ USING check_function ] OPTIONS (optname optarg [, ...])

> check_function should be related to one language, so you have to
> specify language if you would to specify check_function (if we would
> to have more check functions for one language).

Right, I forgot LANGUAGE:

CHECK FUNCTION { func(args) | ALL IN LANGUAGE pl [IN SCHEMA schema] [FOR ROLE user] }
 [ USING check_function ] OPTIONS (optname optarg [, ...])

If func(args) is given, the language can be inferred.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

• Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement at 2011-12-02 20:33:00 from Pavel Stehule

Responses

• Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement at 2011-12-07 07:23:32 from Pavel Stehule

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Brar Piening	Date: 2011-12-03 12:59:58
	Subject: Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches
Previous:	From: Kohei KaiGai	Date: 2011-12-03 08:43:27
	Subject: Re: Prep object creation hooks, and related sepgsql updates