Re: Suggestion for pgAgent

From: "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
To: "Dave Page *EXTERN*" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Suggestion for pgAgent
Date: 2009-11-18 12:24:38
Message-ID: D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C203938049@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Dave Page wrote:
> In further thought though - why can't you just set the target database
> of the step to be 'remote' and then specify a connection string with a
> specified username?

I am running version 1.8 here, and this feature is new in 1.10,
that's why I didn't see it.

You are right, that completely solves my problem and there is
no need for an additional user field.

Thanks!

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message pgAdmin Trac 2009-11-18 22:48:11 [pgAdmin III] #92: Add drag and drop support for files in the query tool
Previous Message Dave Page 2009-11-17 18:15:32 Re: Suggestion for pgAgent