Re: Maintenance Policy?

From: "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
To: "Tom Lane *EXTERN*" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Maintenance Policy?
Date: 2009-07-13 07:10:28
Message-ID: D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C203937E1A@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'd suggest that we publish an official policy, with the following dates
>> for "EOL":
>
> But on the whole I think we should NOT have such a policy, at all.
[...]
> If someone wants a guaranteed EOL date, they ought to be contracting
> with a commercial support company and paying appropriately.

+1 (for not having EOL dates)

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-07-13 07:16:49 Index-only scans
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-07-13 05:11:39 Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org