Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System

From: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "mlw" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: "Lamar Owen" <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, "PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System
Date: 2003-02-01 04:26:47
Message-ID: D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B8294CD8C8@voyager.corporate.connx.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 8:24 PM
> To: mlw
> Cc: Lamar Owen; Dann Corbit; PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System
>
>
> mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> writes:
> > Like it or not, if PG releases a very good Win32 port, ALL the
> > unixoids
> > combined will be out numbered by the windoze users.
>
> A lot of us are *not* looking forward to that prospect.

In all seriousness, it may be a good idea to create a special list
server group for that exact audience. Call it "Win32 PostgreSQL Users"
or something like that. That way, then can help each other. And the
experienced PG users that can stand the noise can pop over to help from
time to time.

You might have one million PG users in 6 months time. Literally.

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-02-01 04:35:32 Re: [PERFORM] not using index for select min(...)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-02-01 04:23:59 Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System