On Sep 27, 2007, at 9:39 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> I was just talking with one of my developers (Alexey) and he said, why
> not just use Pg. Which is an interesting point. Consider that
> is properly known as Volkswagen but commonly (and most of the time)
> referred to as VW.
> Why don't we just stop this whole PostgreSQL->Postgres->Postgre
> junk and
> just say, PostgreSQL, also referred to as PG.
> Heck, I know plenty of people that just say PG, or PGSQL, myself
+1 I like it.
From a design standpoint, 'Pg' is nicer. I know we're not there yet,
but just sayin'.
Information Systems Manager
Chris King Precision Components
Made in Portland, Oregon
www.chrisking.com / 503.972.4050 x230
In response to
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Marc G. Fournier||Date: 2007-09-27 17:14:07|
|Subject: Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.|
|Previous:||From: Joshua D. Drake||Date: 2007-09-27 16:39:40|
|Subject: Dropping postgres as a whole.|