Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.

From: Selena Deckelmann <sdeckelmann(at)chrisking(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy List <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
Date: 2007-09-27 17:11:34
Message-ID: D88EC1E3-7379-49C1-9338-25AA6A925B20@chrisking.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Sep 27, 2007, at 9:39 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I was just talking with one of my developers (Alexey) and he said, why
> not just use Pg. Which is an interesting point. Consider that  
> Volkswagen
> is properly known as Volkswagen but commonly (and most of the time)
> referred to as VW.
>
> Why don't we just stop this whole PostgreSQL->Postgres->Postgre  
> junk and
> just say, PostgreSQL, also referred to as PG.
>
> Heck, I know plenty of people that just say PG, or PGSQL, myself  
> included.

+1 I like it.

 From a design standpoint, 'Pg' is nicer. I know we're not there yet,  
but just sayin'.

-selena


-- 
Selena Deckelmann
Information Systems Manager
Chris King Precision Components
Made in Portland, Oregon
www.chrisking.com / 503.972.4050 x230




In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2007-09-27 17:14:07
Subject: Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2007-09-27 16:39:40
Subject: Dropping postgres as a whole.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group