Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: int8 becames string in BDE :-(

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: <zuschlag2(at)online(dot)de>
Cc: <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: int8 becames string in BDE :-(
Date: 2002-06-06 13:59:47
Message-ID: D85C66DA59BA044EB96AB9683819CF61015334@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: zuschlag2(at)online(dot)de [mailto:zuschlag2(at)online(dot)de] 
> Sent: 06 June 2002 14:58
> To: Dave Page
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] int8 becames string in BDE :-(
> 
> 
> Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> schrieb am 06.06.2002, 12:36:21:
> 
> > and for the other 10% many will not use more than one or two DSNs 
> > anyway.
> 
> I use 3 and more...

Actually, I have about 8 on my own machine, but I never use the defaults
- I just set them up individually.

> > In an ideal world, *I* (and I realise others may disagree) 
> I think we 
> > should have a simplified list of options, taking into account that 
> > some are no longer relevant, and that the only defaults are 
> those that 
> > are hardcoded into the driver.
> 
> I agree.
> 
> regards
> 
> Johann Zuschlag
> 

pgsql-odbc by date

Next:From: Balt van ReesDate: 2002-06-06 15:57:02
Subject: Error when changing views
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2002-06-06 10:36:21
Subject: Re: int8 becames string in BDE :-(

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group