On Feb 24, 2006, at 11:32 AM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> My bad experiences were with the 2600 series machines. We now have
> some
> 2800 and they're much better than the 2600/2650s I've used in the
> past.
Yes, the 2450 and 2650 were CRAP disk performers. I haven't any 2850
to compare, just an 1850.