Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Reliability recommendations

From: Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>
To: Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reliability recommendations
Date: 2006-02-24 16:40:25
Message-ID: D6D6A430-70C6-4AEA-A47A-4783E5304E3B@khera.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Feb 24, 2006, at 11:32 AM, Scott Marlowe wrote:

> My bad experiences were with the 2600 series machines.  We now have  
> some
> 2800 and they're much better than the 2600/2650s I've used in the  
> past.

Yes, the 2450 and 2650 were CRAP disk performers.  I haven't any 2850  
to compare, just an 1850.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2006-02-24 16:51:28
Subject: Re: Reliability recommendations
Previous:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2006-02-24 16:32:22
Subject: Re: Reliability recommendations

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group