Re: Bug #669: gawk: cmd. line:2: (END OF FILE)

From: "Lecessi, Ralph" <ralph(dot)lecessi(at)lmco(dot)com>
To: "Lecessi, Ralph" <ralph(dot)lecessi(at)lmco(dot)com>, "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug #669: gawk: cmd. line:2: (END OF FILE)
Date: 2002-05-21 17:30:27
Message-ID: D6AC37B2F664D4119F2A0008C7E65D58067B6CAF@emss04m06.cpc.lmms.lmco.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Gawk --version returns :
GNU awk 3.0.2

Thanks for the help . I'll try initdb as soon as I'm done building.

Regards,
Ralph Lecessi

> ----------
> From: Tom Lane[SMTP:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:57 PM
> To: Lecessi, Ralph
> Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [BUGS] Bug #669: gawk: cmd. line:2: (END OF FILE)
>
> "Lecessi, Ralph" <ralph(dot)lecessi(at)lmco(dot)com> writes:
> >>Do you have another flavor of awk available to try? I still doubt that
> >>it's gawk's fault, but we need to eliminate possibilities.
>
> > I ran with nawk (/usr/bin/nawk) & the parse error went away.
>
> Interesting. What version of gawk have you got? People build all the
> time using gawk on Linux, and no one's ever reported such a failure that
> I can recall. (FWIW, "gawk --version" reports 3.1.0 on my Linux box,
> and I also build successfully with gawk 3.0.4 on my HPUX box.)
>
> > Is their any way I can check if the awk output is valid (is their
> > anything I can check for or compare with) ?
>
> If you can initdb and run the regression tests successfully, then you
> can be quite certain genbki worked.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-05-21 18:54:05 Re: Bug #668: cursors with params: mismatched parentheses;
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-05-21 16:57:01 Re: Bug #669: gawk: cmd. line:2: (END OF FILE)