Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bug #669: gawk: cmd. line:2: (END OF FILE)

From: "Lecessi, Ralph" <ralph(dot)lecessi(at)lmco(dot)com>
To: "Lecessi, Ralph" <ralph(dot)lecessi(at)lmco(dot)com>,"'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug #669: gawk: cmd. line:2: (END OF FILE)
Date: 2002-05-21 16:28:54
Message-ID: D6AC37B2F664D4119F2A0008C7E65D58067B6CAE@emss04m06.cpc.lmms.lmco.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
	>Do you have another flavor of awk available to try?  I still doubt
that
	>it's gawk's fault, but we need to eliminate possibilities.

I ran with nawk (/usr/bin/nawk) & the parse error went away. Is their any
way I can check if the
awk output is valid (is their anything I can check for or compare with) ?

Thanks for your help,

Ralph Lecessi

> ----------
> From: 	Tom Lane[SMTP:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 	Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:17 AM
> To: 	Lecessi, Ralph
> Cc: 	pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: 	Re: [BUGS] Bug #669: gawk: cmd. line:2: (END OF FILE)
> 
> "Lecessi, Ralph" <ralph(dot)lecessi(at)lmco(dot)com> writes:
> > Sun OS 5.6
> > /bin/sh is a Bourne shell.
> 
> Hmph.  Nothing particularly unusual-seeming about that.
> 
> Do you have another flavor of awk available to try?  I still doubt that
> it's gawk's fault, but we need to eliminate possibilities.
> 
> Another thing to check is whether you might have a corrupted copy of
> genbki.sh.  In 7.2.1 I get these numbers from "wc genbki.sh":
> 	424 1609 10863
> If yours match then it's probably okay.
> 
> 			regards, tom lane
> 

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-05-21 16:57:01
Subject: Re: Bug #669: gawk: cmd. line:2: (END OF FILE)
Previous:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2002-05-21 16:19:13
Subject: Re: [SQL] Bug with Daylight Savings Time & Interval

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group