Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support.

From: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,"Ryan Bradetich" <rbradetich(at)gmail(dot)com>,"Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>,<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support.
Date: 2008-07-25 20:14:09
Message-ID: D425483C2C5C9F49B5B7A41F8944154701000FAC@postal.corporate.connx.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net]
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 1:11 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: Tom Lane; Ryan Bradetich; Gregory Stark; pgsql-
> hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [RFC] Unsigned integer support.
> 
> 
> 
> Dann Corbit wrote:
> >
> > CREATE DOMAIN usmallint AS SMALLINT CHECK(VALUE > 0);
> > CREATE DOMAIN uinteger AS INTEGER CHECK(VALUE > 0);
> > CREATE DOMAIN ubigint AS BIGINT CHECK(VALUE > 0);
> > CREATE DOMAIN unumeric AS NUMERIC CHECK(VALUE > 0);
> >
> >
> >
> 
> s/>/>=/g

I turned off the default "option" to remove extra line breaks.  
Future posts should not be quite as even and bletcherous.
God willing, and the crick don't rise.


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Ron MayerDate: 2008-07-25 20:18:47
Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2008-07-25 20:11:17
Subject: Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group