Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support.

From: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Ryan Bradetich" <rbradetich(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support.
Date: 2008-07-25 20:14:09
Message-ID: D425483C2C5C9F49B5B7A41F8944154701000FAC@postal.corporate.connx.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net]
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 1:11 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: Tom Lane; Ryan Bradetich; Gregory Stark; pgsql-
> hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [RFC] Unsigned integer support.
>
>
>
> Dann Corbit wrote:
> >
> > CREATE DOMAIN usmallint AS SMALLINT CHECK(VALUE > 0);
> > CREATE DOMAIN uinteger AS INTEGER CHECK(VALUE > 0);
> > CREATE DOMAIN ubigint AS BIGINT CHECK(VALUE > 0);
> > CREATE DOMAIN unumeric AS NUMERIC CHECK(VALUE > 0);
> >
> >
> >
>
> s/>/>=/g

I turned off the default "option" to remove extra line breaks.
Future posts should not be quite as even and bletcherous.
God willing, and the crick don't rise.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Mayer 2008-07-25 20:18:47 Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-07-25 20:11:17 Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support.