> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Christopher Browne
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 9:56 AM
> To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [HACKERS] Will PostgreSQL get ported to CUDA?
> 2008/1/30 Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>:
> > http://www.nvidia.com/object/cuda_learn.html
> > http://www.nvidia.com/object/cuda_get.html
> Someone at CMU has tried this, somewhat fruitfully.
> This was based on GPUSort:
> Unfortunately, the licensing of GPUSort is, if anything, more awful
> than that for CUDA.
> This would need to get pretty totally reimplemented to be useful with
> PostgreSQL. Happily, we actually have some evidence that the exercise
> would be of some value. Further, it looks to me like the
> implementation that was done was done in a pretty naive way.
> Something done more seriously would likely be radically better...
It's too bad that they have a restrictive license.
Perhaps there is an opportunity to create an "information appliance"
that contains a special build of PostgreSQL, a nice heap of super-speedy
disk, and a big pile of GPUs for sort and merge type operations. The
thing that seems nice to me about this idea is that you would have a
very stable test platform (all hardware and software combinations would
be known and thoroughly tested) and you might also get some extreme
I guess that a better sort than GPUSort could be written from scratch,
but legal entanglements with the use of the graphics cards may make the
whole concept DOA.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2008-01-30 20:59:38|
|Subject: Re: 8.3RC1 on windows missing descriptive Event handle
|Previous:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2008-01-30 20:55:22|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable|