Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: why is postgres-R not in standard dev Path.

From: Thomas F(dot)O'Connell <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com>
To: chinni <naveen(dot)bysani(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: why is postgres-R not in standard dev Path.
Date: 2004-07-27 09:10:34
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers

It's a master-multislave replication system that has a pretty robust 
development cycle. It just reached a 1.0 release.

Whether any solution becomes a core part of the distribution remains, I 
think, to be seen.


On Jul 27, 2004, at 4:03 AM, chinni wrote:

>       Postgres-R is a multi server (write anywhere) replication tool
> which is possibly important for any enterprise if they want to shift
> to postgres.
> Did you guys debate on merging it.
> As of now They are working on postgres 7.2 and developing postgres-R.
> They plan to do it for 7.4 as well, why not merge these things.
> Is the postgres team planing to come up with a similar tool themselves 
> ?

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thomas HallgrenDate: 2004-07-27 09:39:54
Subject: Re: Binary Cursors, and the COPY command
Previous:From: chinniDate: 2004-07-27 09:03:16
Subject: why is postgres-R not in standard dev Path.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group