Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Interesting rant mentioning PostgreSQL...

From: Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Interesting rant mentioning PostgreSQL...
Date: 2006-06-06 18:51:35
Message-ID: CF31B756-CF6C-441C-95A6-0CC78A409E2C@pervasive.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
http://blog.develix.com/frog/user/cliff/article/2006-06-04/9

I learned databases on MySQL and used it for several years. Then I  
discovered PostgreSQL and realized that in fact, I'd learned nothing  
of databases. For years the MySQL developers were quite vocal that  
things like referential integrity, transactions, subselects, etc were  
little more than baggage that could be done better another way. They  
were after speed, pure and simple. Fair enough, in some respect,  
since the job MySQL was originally developed for didn't require any  
of those things. The problem is that a whole generation of database  
programmers believed them, despite the fact that their applications  
*did* require those things. Someone in authority told them they  
didn't and they bought it (and still buy it). Let me clue you in: you  
need these things or you need to let someone else handle your  
database work for you.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461




pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Chris BrowneDate: 2006-06-06 20:09:00
Subject: Re: Quick Reference Software Guide
Previous:From: Chander GanesanDate: 2006-06-06 17:06:00
Subject: Re: Quick Reference Software Guide

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group