Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Table Partitioning: Will it be supported in Future?

From: "Mohan, Ross" <RMohan(at)arbinet(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Table Partitioning: Will it be supported in Future?
Date: 2005-04-26 16:58:31
Message-ID: CC74E7E10A8A054798B6611BD1FEF4D307966BF5@vamail01.thexchange.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Maybe he needs to spend $7K on performance improvements? 

;-)



-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Josh Berkus
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 8:00 PM
To: Richard Huxton
Cc: apoc9009(at)yahoo(dot)de; pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Table Partitioning: Will it be supported in Future?


Richard,

> I believe these are being worked on at the moment. You might want to 
> search the archives of the hackers mailing list to see if the plans 
> will suit your needs.

Actually, this is being discussed through the Bizgres project: 
www.bizgres.org.

However, I agree that a 1GB table is not in need of partitioning.

-- 
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Steve PoeDate: 2005-04-26 17:49:46
Subject: Re: pgbench Comparison of 7.4.7 to 8.0.2
Previous:From: Andreas PflugDate: 2005-04-26 15:53:46
Subject: Re: Table Partitioning: Will it be supported in Future?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group