Re: PG performance comparison vs Oracle

From: "Mohan, Ross" <RMohan(at)arbinet(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG performance comparison vs Oracle
Date: 2005-05-17 18:34:44
Message-ID: CC74E7E10A8A054798B6611BD1FEF4D30625DAE0@vamail01.thexchange.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Lee,


Terse pointers:



1) Some posted already in list. Although, it may have been "performance".
This question might be better addressed there. YMMV.

2) Performance of _what_? Concurrent reads? Single user batch loads?
DW application? Multitable updates? "pure" OLTP? "pure" OLAP?

Finding out "Who is the winner?" requires that you first design a racecourse.


3) www.tpc.org (for ideas; no decent PG or MySQL benchmarks I could find there

4) Performance is measured against hw, sw budget dollars and also against user
perceptions. This would be part of the racecourse, IMHO.

5) As a "rule", at extremes of largeness, nothing beats oracle.


Hope These Help a bit,


Ross

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Lee Wu
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 1:25 PM
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [ADMIN] PG performance comparison vs Oracle

Hi all,

Anyone has it or point to me the right direction?

Thanks,

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ing. Jhon Carrillo 2005-05-18 13:27:45 database A to database B
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2005-05-17 17:25:51 Re: Cannot verify signature of win32 8.0.3 distribution.