From: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL www" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: PGSQL-WINDOWS mailing list? |
Date: | 2004-08-13 08:57:26 |
Message-ID: | CC684322-ED06-11D8-831D-000A95C88220@myrealbox.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Aug 13, 2004, at 4:13 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Robert Treat [mailto:xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net]
>>
>> We don't currently have an FAQ for each list, maybe we should
>> start with that and mail that out whenever someone subscribes.
>
> Definitely not a bad idea to do anyway, but I'm thinking more along the
> lines of helping ppl before they even get to the lists.
Would it make sense to trim the faqs a bit? There's a lot of
information in there, and people might be hesitant to dive into them.
Of course, they *should* look at the faq, as there's a lot of good
stuff in there, but then again, people should read the docs too.
Also, if you subscribe via the web interface, there's a link to view
the faq, even before you subscribe. However, there are currently no
faqs for the lists. This is a pretty visible place where people have
the opportunity to read the faq, and often they're joining the list
because they have a question. Perhaps we could head them off a few
questions there?
Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2004-08-13 09:26:16 | Re: Request for download stats on release |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2004-08-13 07:13:20 | Re: PGSQL-WINDOWS mailing list? |