Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings

From: decibel <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings
Date: 2009-09-28 22:52:18
Message-ID: CC66F887-4067-4745-97B5-48F7E2B168AC@decibel.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sep 27, 2009, at 9:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> What we seem to be lacking in this case is a good tech-speak
> option for the underlying catalog name.  I'm still not happy
> with having a catalog and a view that are exactly the same
> except for "s", especially since as Alvaro notes that won't
> lead to desirable tab-completion behavior.  OTOH, we have
> survived with pg_index vs pg_indexes, so maybe it wouldn't
> kill us.


Another option is to revisit the set of system views (http:// 
pgfoundry.org/projects/newsysviews/). IIRC there was some other  
recent reason we wanted to do that.
-- 
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect  decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2009-09-28 22:52:56
Subject: Re: Rejecting weak passwords
Previous:From: Bernd HelmleDate: 2009-09-28 22:33:03
Subject: Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group