2012/2/22 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I had to reply to query about usage VACUUM ANALYZE or ANALYZE. I
>> expected so ANALYZE should be faster then VACUUM ANALYZE.
>>
>> But is not true. Why?
>
> I'm pretty sure that VACUUM ANALYZE *will* be faster than ANALYZE in
> general, because VACUUM has to scan the whole table, and ANALYZE only
> a fixed-size subset of its pages.

It sounds like you just said the opposite of what you wanted to say.

Nicolas

-- 
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?

In response to

• Re: VACUUM ANALYZE is faster than ANALYZE? at 2012-02-22 12:59:39 from Robert Haas

Responses

• Re: VACUUM ANALYZE is faster than ANALYZE? at 2012-02-22 13:33:07 from Robert Haas

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira	Date: 2012-02-22 13:14:08
	Subject: Re: temporal algebra and data type
Previous:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2012-02-22 12:59:39
	Subject: Re: VACUUM ANALYZE is faster than ANALYZE?