2012/2/22 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I had to reply to query about usage VACUUM ANALYZE or ANALYZE. I
>> expected so ANALYZE should be faster then VACUUM ANALYZE.
>> But is not true. Why?
> I'm pretty sure that VACUUM ANALYZE *will* be faster than ANALYZE in
> general, because VACUUM has to scan the whole table, and ANALYZE only
> a fixed-size subset of its pages.
It sounds like you just said the opposite of what you wanted to say.
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira||Date: 2012-02-22 13:14:08|
|Subject: Re: temporal algebra and data type|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-02-22 12:59:39|
|Subject: Re: VACUUM ANALYZE is faster than ANALYZE?|