From: | Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | hans wulf <lotu1(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 9.1.3 Standby catchup mode |
Date: | 2012-04-06 21:54:54 |
Message-ID: | CAOzAquKs887uvEon-qm_bTxA1szOBwby_M9YAWhYWjnrtW=g+g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:35 PM, hans wulf <lotu1(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> I am wondering how the catchup mode of a hot synchron slave server works
> on 9.1.3 if there is no WAL archive.
>
Why would you not want to maintain a WAL archive? Are you depending on the
slave server(s) as your only form of backup?
It isn't clear what you want from synchronous streaming replication, or if
you understand the difference between synchronous streaming replication and
asynchronous streaming replication.
--
Mike Nolan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alain | 2012-04-07 15:56:25 | Re: BD impossible à recharger |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2012-04-06 21:49:28 | Re: PANIC: corrupted item pointer |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shigeru Hanada | 2012-04-06 22:45:33 | Re: WIP: Collecting statistics on CSV file data |
Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2012-04-06 21:46:25 | Re: Range Types regression failure |