Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application

From: Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application
Date: 2012-04-10 15:28:23
Message-ID: CAOeZVicsfHexSnqQX_ZuFqhgcChzkViKTsNiOjMKOg9qUyRGDg@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-jdbc
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> ...  We have to invoke java and there
>> are two basic ways to tie into the java runtime:  one is to jump
>> through SPI via the SQL executor. The other is JNI into the pl/java
>> jvm which I think you were hinting was the better approach.
>
> Hm?  SPI doesn't know anything about Java either.
>
>                        regards, tom lane

Hi Tom,

We plan to call SQL through SPI from the FDW,which in turn would call
the Pl/Java routine.

We are working on the JNI Invocation API approach also.We will be
currently researching the differences between the two approaches(SPI
and JNI).

Atri

-- 
Regards,

Atri
l'apprenant

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jeff JanesDate: 2012-04-10 15:31:40
Subject: Re: To Do wiki
Previous:From: Dave CramerDate: 2012-04-10 15:27:35
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-04-10 15:36:38
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application
Previous:From: Dave CramerDate: 2012-04-10 15:27:35
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group