On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> It's the "lobotomized engines" that are the problem, IMO --- people
>> coming from databases like mysql tend to think count(*) just means
>> reading a table size counter that the engine has anyway.
> This is probably a much less common misconception than formerly, due
> to the rise of InnoDB and the falling-out-of-favor experienced by
True. For instance the Drizzle project simply yanked myisam as an
engine out of mysql for their fork, and made innodb the standard
default table handler.
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-11-05 19:52:29|
|Subject: Re: collation charts/tables |
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-11-04 20:10:57|
|Subject: Re: docs update for count(*) and index-only scans|