| From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mike Toews <mwtoews(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | John Townsend <jtownsend(at)advancedformulas(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Procedural Languages |
| Date: | 2012-05-31 20:57:58 |
| Message-ID: | CAOR=d=2X2bUkYmZoqLCao82HG15aYBgKqUv5xmHZqhdfpRGurw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Mike Toews <mwtoews(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 1 June 2012 02:36, John Townsend <jtownsend(at)advancedformulas(dot)com> wrote:
>> There are least 10 Procedural Languages available for PostGreSQL. The one
>> that comes with the installation is PL/pgSQL.
>
> The count looks closer to 18
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PostgreSQL#Procedural_languages
> but I doubt some get much use (PL/LOLCODE anyone?).
And don't be surprised if you find one not listed there.
For instance, my entire production system runs entirely on pl/bf
https://github.com/mikejs/pl-bf
It's really the only logical choice for critical and complex financial
analysis work.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2012-05-31 21:15:25 | Re: PostgreSQL 9.0.4 crashing |
| Previous Message | John Townsend | 2012-05-31 20:57:54 | Re: Procedural Languages |