> So coming back to the issue, do you think it's a good idea to teach
> ATAddCheckConstraint() that the call is coming from a late phase of ALTER
> TABLE ?
>
> +1

You mentioned AT_PASS_OLD_INDEX in your original mail, but I guess that you
meant that we should check for  AT_PASS_OLD_CONSTR and then not raise an
error?

Regards,
Nikhils
-- 
StormDB - http://www.stormdb.com
The Database Cloud
Postgres-XC Support and Service

In response to

• Re: Bug in ALTER COLUMN SET DATA TYPE ? at 2012-11-02 15:58:34 from Pavan Deolasee

Responses

• Re: Bug in ALTER COLUMN SET DATA TYPE ? at 2012-11-03 04:55:13 from Pavan Deolasee

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Pavan Deolasee	Date: 2012-11-03 04:55:13
	Subject: Re: Bug in ALTER COLUMN SET DATA TYPE ?
Previous:	From: Josh Berkus	Date: 2012-11-03 01:44:25
	Subject: Re: RFC: Timing Events