Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Gartner report on Postgresql

From: Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)chesnok(dot)com>
To: Jim(dot)Smith(at)bull(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Gartner report on Postgresql
Date: 2012-08-03 19:36:24
Message-ID: CAN1EF+wmkpy-HYDwNOhC=7XncQYMfP0fdzPoVgEH6931Oq3-5A@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:36 PM,  <Jim(dot)Smith(at)bull(dot)com> wrote:
>
>  I have a potential customer that would like to see a Gartner review which
> includes PostgreSQL.  Has anyone seen something like this?
>
> Jim Smith

451Group recently published a report that I found very interesting:

http://www.slideshare.net/mattaslett/mysql-vs-nosql-and-newsql-survey-results-13073043

Blog post here:
http://blogs.the451group.com/information_management/2012/05/25/survey-results/


-- 
http://chesnok.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2012-08-03 22:39:42
Subject: Re: Gartner report on Postgresql
Previous:From: Atri SharmaDate: 2012-08-03 17:01:59
Subject: Re: Call for RCs for 9.2 release

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group