Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: CLOG contention

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CLOG contention
Date: 2012-01-28 21:23:17
Message-ID: CAMkU=1x5CbRc7Bw4L_ABw5PrZXrHQ58_Sxdu9QKnQq=hBbxC=g@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Patch to remove clog contention caused by dirty clog LRU.
>
> v2, minor changes, updated for recent commits

This no longer applies to file src/backend/postmaster/bgwriter.c, due
to the latch code, and I'm not confident I know how to fix it.

Cheers,

Jeff

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Noah MischDate: 2012-01-28 21:25:06
Subject: Re: Second thoughts on CheckIndexCompatible() vs.operator families
Previous:From: C├ędric VillemainDate: 2012-01-28 21:22:03
Subject: Re: Inline Extension

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group