Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Parallel (concurrent) inserts?

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ivan Voras <ivoras(at)freebsd(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Parallel (concurrent) inserts?
Date: 2012-05-25 23:36:48
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Ivan Voras <ivoras(at)freebsd(dot)org> wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm wondering if there is ia document describing which guarantees (if
> any) PostgreSQL makes about concurrency for various operations? Speaking
> in general (i.e. IO can handle it, number of CPU cores and client
> threads is optimal), are fully concurrent operations (independant and
> non-blocking) possible for:

By "fully concurrent" do you mean that there is no detectable
sub-linear scaling at all?  I'm pretty sure that no such guarantees
can be made.

> 1) An unindexed table?

For concurrent bulk loads, there was severe contention on generating
WAL between concurrent bulk loaders.  That is greatly improved in the
upcoming 9.2 release.

> 2) A table with 1+ ordinary (default btree) indexes? (are there
> constraints on the structure and number of indexes?)

This will be limited by contention for generating WAL.  (Unless
something else limits it first)

> 3) A table with 1+ unique indexes?

If more than one transaction attempts to insert the same value, one
has to block until the other either commits or rollbacks.

> 4) A table with other objects on it (foreign keys, check constraints, etc.)?

Same as above.  If they try to do conflicting things, they don't
continue operating concurrently.



In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Ivan VorasDate: 2012-05-25 23:56:57
Subject: Re: Parallel (concurrent) inserts?
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2012-05-25 23:13:54
Subject: Re: Parallel (concurrent) inserts?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group