Thank you. Now I see that page consists of record pointers list build
from offset and length so there is no benefit of having constant
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 17:03, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 4:03 AM, Krzysztof Chodak
> <krzysztof(dot)chodak(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Is there any performance benefit of using constant size tuples?
> not really. If your tuple size is under a known maximum length, then
> a toast table doesn't have to be created. that's a pretty minor
> detail though.
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Greg Smith||Date: 2011-08-19 17:20:27|
|Subject: Re: Reports from SSD purgatory|
|Previous:||From: Merlin Moncure||Date: 2011-08-19 15:03:52|
|Subject: Re: Variable versus constrant size tuples|