From: | Robert Klemme <shortcutter(at)googlemail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump and thousands of schemas |
Date: | 2012-05-31 13:38:35 |
Message-ID: | CAM9pMnM9vLd8HiNCqeskMwij4MAEjSb76pKDRnnh=uRpL4U17A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> Just for record, I rerun the test again with my single-LOCK patch, and
> now total runtime of pg_dump is 113 minutes.
> 188 minutes(9.0)->125 minutes(git master)->113 minutes(with my patch).
>
> So far, I'm glad to see 40% time savings at this point.
I see only 9.6% savings (100 * (113/125 - 1)). What am I missing?
Cheers
robert
--
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-05-31 13:51:25 | Re: FailedAssertion("!(PrivateRefCount[i] == 0)", File: "bufmgr.c", Line: 1741 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-05-31 13:31:18 | Re: heap_form_tuple crashing |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2012-05-31 14:07:57 | Re: pg_dump and thousands of schemas |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2012-05-31 08:45:26 | Re: pg_dump and thousands of schemas |