Re: Eliminating CREATE INDEX comparator TID tie-breaker overhead

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Eliminating CREATE INDEX comparator TID tie-breaker overhead
Date: 2015-07-30 00:41:10
Message-ID: CAM3SWZQN6SeP8-k=_uxWf7bXST_9NsZEuCoMHpuswyWQ9ebCiQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> If no one weighs in after a few days, I'll mark the patch "rejected"
> in the CF app.

The patch has been marked "rejected" in the CF app. I withdraw it.

Obviously I still think that the patch is worthwhile, but not if that
"while" is disproportionate to any benefit, which I suspect will be
the case if I proceed.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-07-30 01:05:59 Using quicksort and a merge step to significantly improve on tuplesort's single run "external sort"
Previous Message Joe Conway 2015-07-30 00:35:58 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Row-Level Security Policies (RLS)