On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 22:19, Giuseppe Sucameli <brush(dot)tyler(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:
> thinking you have no skills, I wrote a patch too and posted it to
> hackers ML about 2 days ago, but I didn't subscribe that list so
> it is stalled, waiting for someone's approval.
> For this reason my email is not displayed in the archives.
> I'm so sorry both have wasted our time in writing 2 patches for
> the same bug.
I think your patch is more complete than mine so it's definitely not
wasted. I spent several hours on mine and now I have a little bit of
Thank you for your effort; I'm sorry if you feel you have wasted your time.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Noah Misch||Date: 2012-01-26 11:55:36|
|Subject: Re: Second thoughts on CheckIndexCompatible() vs.operator families|
|Previous:||From: Kohei KaiGai||Date: 2012-01-26 10:19:49|
|Subject: Re: [v9.2] LEAKPROOF attribute of FUNCTION (Re: [v9.2] Fix
Leaky View Problem)|
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: emre.hasegeli||Date: 2012-01-26 12:46:37|
|Subject: BUG #6411: Backend process' crash when a foreign table is used in adependent subquery on select clause|
|Previous:||From: Sasa.Petrovic||Date: 2012-01-26 08:31:28|
|Subject: One question about VACUUMDB command - please|