| From: | Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net> |
| Cc: | David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Using Postgresql as application server |
| Date: | 2011-08-15 22:57:03 |
| Message-ID: | CAKt_ZftgpuGNbyxvQ_Bf0QrjahY5=HbxcoUUuxUYCdKbY=rp0g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net> wrote:
>
> I believe we basically have all the foundation already, with maybe
> procedures executable outside transactions being the last major part.
>
Why is this desirable? Why is it more desirable than actually using
the listen/notify infrastructure that exists already?
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2011-08-16 00:06:22 | Re: Using Postgresql as application server |
| Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2011-08-15 22:50:18 | Re: Postgresql 8.4 replication using Londiste |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | MirrorX | 2011-08-15 23:06:39 | Re: backup-strategies for large databases |
| Previous Message | Darren Duncan | 2011-08-15 22:47:36 | Re: Using Postgresql as application server |