On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Maxim Boguk <maxim(dot)boguk(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >> I know GIST on intarray do not have that problem.
> >> Very likely the problem is limited to intarray GIN indexes only
> >> (but I going to test some other not-well known GIN indexes tomorrow).
> >> Broken FTS indexes on Hot Standby should be known years before.
> > You might think that, but you'd be wrong :-(.
> Yes, that did sound ominous.
> > ginRedoUpdateMetapage
> > is failing to restore the contents of the pending-list correctly,
> > which means this is broken for all types of GIN indexes. Will fix.
> Great detective work Tom as ever, much appreciated.
Thank you very much.
Is that fix will be included to the next minor versions releases?
(especially into 9.1.2)?
Senior Postgresql DBA.
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: David Schnur||Date: 2011-11-28 22:20:42|
|Subject: Re: Repeatable crash in pg_dump (with -d2 info)|
|Previous:||From: Phil Sorber||Date: 2011-11-28 21:14:41|
|Subject: Re: objects tied to missing extension|