Re: BUG #6286: Table Partitioning - SQL/MED - interaction broken

From: Greg Fausak <greg(at)named(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #6286: Table Partitioning - SQL/MED - interaction broken
Date: 2011-11-04 16:16:54
Message-ID: CAJ=yfkMZi-+HD9abeBT6dCBAUN8z7KDivfwjKwODnaNk5iu2ig@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Right. Thanks for all the feedback guys.
I was just trying to figure out how to do sql/med with partitioned tables.
Can't go there, got it.

-g

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > "Greg Fausak" <greg(at)named(dot)com> writes:
> >> Here is the bug when trying to use the two together with a rule to bind
> >> them:
> >
> >> create rule "_RETURN" as on select to X do instead select * from Y;
> >
> > Creating rules on inheritance children isn't supported, and you should
> > not hold your breath waiting for it to be.
> >
> > We probably ought to have something in there to throw an error ...
>
> Probably not for rules in general, but we shouldn't let people turn
> tables into views if they are involved in table inheritance, as either
> a parent or a child.
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Jackson (817) 233-2385 2011-11-04 16:39:07 Re: BUG #6281: need to remove
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-11-04 16:14:10 Re: BUG #6286: Table Partitioning - SQL/MED - interaction broken