Re: Regarding identifying a foreign scan

On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Does that mean that using (some) global storage is the cause of the problem?
>
> If you're using global storage for state that needs to be replicated
> per-scan, yes, probably. But it's hard to be sure when you're being
> so vague about what you're doing.

yeah -- the problem here is that Atri is not using
ForeignScanState->fdw_state properly for storage (this in jdbc-fdw).
I think he knows what to do -- he's going to fix it up.

merlin